This essay is about abuse reports, guidelines and other intellectual essentials.
I've been troubled to explain why certain individuals report fictions on FFN. With this post, It'll be a lot easier to concentrate all relevant points in one place.
Let's start with the basic topic list and introduction.
1. Abuse Reports: What are they?
2. The Blue Book and Guidelines
3. Benefits of Reporting
4. Idle Consequences
5. Excuses/Questions
You may all guess the first four points are general, and the last one is of interest to anyone that has already experienced the result of an abuse report and/or requires mentoring on the issue of common questions people ask about reporting abuse.
1. Abuse Reports: What are they?
The Abuse Report is a way of communicating with the Fan Fiction dot Net (FFN) administration for FFN community members, visitors and bots. It is the only tool of enforcing quality control on the site, which depends on honesty and goodwill of its users. Every Possible Abuse Report is assessed in a case-by-case basis. Should a user's complaint be viable, disciplinary action is taken immediately in the form of irrevocable loss of artwork and a banning period, which extends after every infraction. Users that have performed horrendous acts lose the right to host an account on FFN.
With the whole process covered in a pill, we might go through every part.
-Possible Abuse located
-Possible Abuse reported
-Report Assessed
-Actions Taken
Let's try to locate abuse. I'll save you time searching for something horrible on the domain with a ready example.
Here is a story that users would report as abusive: http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5104246/1/
Why? It is a chatroom upload, not poetry or a novel. The rules are discussed in the next point, so don't worry if you're a bit confused.
We pick a category, write the message to describe the abuse as an illegal format and click 'send'.
The message then goes into queue in the administrator's machine. Usually, the queue takes two weeks with a cooldown period for the story's author to take action. Only usually because sometimes the responsible people are busy multi-tasking, so action is delayed. It gives the offensive story even more time to be fixed and tinkered with, so it's nice and acceptable.
When the time comes, the staff member clicks the story link that is automatically provided in an abuse report and reads for a story match of the words in the sent complaint. If such things are not found, the administrator smiles and carries on doing other things.
If the evil stuff is found and that story is still scripted after such a long period of time, the admin gasps and clicks the purge button. No more story.
Other possible actions include: a temporary ban on posting content (from a week to 90 days), account deletion, IP address blacklisting. The last one is fairly new, according to the fresh version of Terms of Service (TOS). That's also the most extreme method of assuring proper order. Bear in mind that FFN is a network, so banned users would be unable to access other domains such as Fiction Press. You are informed of the disciplinary consequences unless it is a complete expulsion. The last instance is irreversible and no account holder has been known to be brought back to activity after appearing on the black list.
In case you are wondering what triggers certain response, look at the second point!
2. The Blue Book and Guidelines
Upon signing up, you are given a claim that your age is 13 or above, and you have the TOS presented, to which you must agree before joining. Remember, to receive the right to upload content and become a member, you accept full responsibility for your actions as well as the administration's authority. You promise to honour these responsibilities, and your decision is forever recorded.
Not reading the TOS is bad. This is not MS Windows with a mile-long disclaimer, so the document is shorter and contains pretty useful information. Remember that the TOS are changed from time to time without informing users. But you won't even know the administrator has the right to change the rules of the game if you don't read that information in the first place! More knowing means more armed. Let's get weapons of understanding. I've quoted some extracts from Terms of Service as of February, 2010.
Some members have claimed that they've found loopholes in the official text. Allow me to inform you, the public, that it is not true. Any misinterpretation of the domain's regulations leads to negative consequences. The site values trust, not lawyer excuses. As soon as you start using a missing word to defend a case, know that trust is lost, and you are reduced to semantic prowling. Until the domain switches for federal ownership, actual people who see beyond excuses and falsified logics remain in the administration. FFN is a friend, not a judge. Respect your friends!
Terms of Service: (with italicised commentary)
"These Terms of Service apply to all users of the FanFiction.Net Website." All are equal.
"FanFiction.Net may, in its sole discretion, modify or revise these Terms of Service and policies at any time, and you agree to be bound by such modifications or revisions."
"You may never use another's account without permission."
"When creating your account, you must provide accurate and complete information."
"You agree not to alter or modify any part of the Website." No revolts.
"You agree not to use the Website for any commercial use."
Commercial use such as: "use of the Website or its related services for the primary purpose of gaining advertising or subscription revenue" No advertising of links/products.
"You understand that when using the FanFiction.Net Website, you will be exposed to User Submissions from a variety of sources, and that FanFiction.Net is not responsible for" it.
"You shall be solely responsible for your own User Submissions and the consequences of posting or publishing them."
"You understand and agree, however, that FanFiction.Net may retain, but not display, distribute, or perform, server copies of User Submissions that have been removed"
"You further agree that you will not, in connection with User Submissions, submit material that is contrary to the FanFiction.Net Community Guidelines."
"FanFiction.Net will terminate a User's access to its Website if, under appropriate circumstances, the User is determined to be an infringer."
"FanFiction.Net reserves the right to decide whether Content or a User Submission is appropriate and complies with these Terms of Service for violations other than copyright infringement or privacy law, such as, but not limited to, hate crimes, pornography, obscene or defamatory material, or excessive length."
"FanFiction.Net may remove such User Submissions and/or terminate a User's access for uploading such material in violation of these Terms of Service at any time, without prior notice and at its sole discretion."
"You affirm that you are over the age of 13, as the FanFiction.Net Website is not intended for children under 13." You are expected to be 13+ old if you enter FFN even to read, not write.
"You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless FanFiction.Net" Defend FFN, do not threaten it! Or banland....
Here are a few extracts from the Privacy Policy. Less exciting, but useful to know.
Privacy Policy
"We do not rent or sell your personally identifying information to other companies or individuals, unless ... we are required by law or have a good faith belief that access, preservation or disclosure of such information is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of FanFiction.Net, its users or the public."
And now the main ingredient, the actual meat of the rule book, the Community Guidelines (Guidelines in short).
Guidelines
They are easily found in the login area, and you accept them once in a while. The page also includes ratings, some of which are not acceptable on FFN for specialisation reasons. The ones excluded are the B supplement for pre-school children reading Simple English, and the MA rating that may contain adult themes or excessive swearing.
The guidelines are divided into sections. Community Etiquette, Entries Not Allowed, Actions Not Allowed and General Rules. I'll provide you the excerpts of rules that are not redundant with italicised commentary.
First section:
"Spell check all story and poetry. There is no excuse for not performing this duty."
"Proofread all entries for grammar and other aspects of writing before submission. 'Hot off the press' content is often riddled with errors ... it is the duty of the writer to perform to the best of his/her ability."
"Respect the reviewers." Respect ALL reviewers, no exclusions. You are behaving against the guidelines if you disrespect any reviewer, and can lose the account.
"Using only capital letters in the story title, summary, or content is not only incorrect but also a disregard for the language itself."
Entries not allowed
"Non-stories: lists, bloopers, polls, previews, challenges, author notes, and etc." Also includes character submission sheets, shout outs to the public, quotes from books, teasers for the upcoming story.
"One or two liners." The author's note is not included in the line count.
"MST: comments inserted in between the flow of a copied story." No copying from Wikipedia articles or news feeds with your laughing comments.
"Stories with non-historical and non-fictional characters: actors, musicians, and etc." No fics about the Jonas Brothers until they're graveyard history.
"Any form of interactive entry: choose your adventure, second person/you based, Q&As, and etc." Includes voting, asking to visit links, asking to call numbers, asking to submit characters, using any other word to hide that it is asking while doing so, asking for ideas, addressing reviewers directly in long notes by name, asking questions directly.
"Chat/script format and keyboard dialogue based entries."
Actions Not Allowed.
"Copying from a previously published work (including musical lyrics) not in the public domain." Plagiarising lyrics in your creative work is not creative. No songs at all!
General Rules
"Entry title and summary must be rated G for all audience." No swearing, no teenage themes, no blood or gore, should be suitable for children aged FIVE.
"Entry must be given the proper rating." No hiding MA as M.
"Entry must be placed in proper category." Crossovers belong in the crossover section.
"Chapters of the same story are not allowed to be submitted as separate entries." Get a beta reader to help you navigate through the login area if you are unable to submit chapters. Also, you are to have a separate file for each chapter.
These are the expectations you have. You accept all of it before posting. Responsibility comes first. You get rights only when you admit being fully responsible for yourself, and realise what will happen if you break the domain's trust.
3. Benefits of Reporting
Why report an illegal fan fiction? For a start, it's one of the responsibilities that come in protecting FFN, as mentioned in the TOS. It is also your right and nobody can condemn you for doing so. Also, it is the only way of assuring good quality front and centre, the only way that always works.
The benefits of a control switch like that are many, and I'll point out only some, so that this essay does not grow out of proportion. The most obvious one is the rise of overall quality on FFN. Currently, the domain is not considered fine or good by users of other websites. Since FFN users are expected to keep the domain's market share, not being a laughing stock is a part of it. When the number of low quality uploads with, say, abishmal spieling, goes down to zero, everyone immediately sees change. Wonderful spelling and English are what makes sites such as Fiction Press feel very elite, above FFN. When the bad examples they point out to support their claims of our fan fiction site being horrible disappear, the FP people don't have an argument, so we're even.
Report a bad story. Don't give others a reason to laugh at us.
Moreover, when you assure a story's removal, the number of faulty examples of a particular infraction in a particular fandom decreases. It discourages others from making the same mistakes by thinking they can do just about anything without consequence.
Report a bad story. Teach the community that crime does not pay.
On top of all that, reporting a faulty work bumps up the low-end margin. It encourages people who think 'my work is not the worst' to do a reality check, because when the safety evil spiral disintegrates from below, they know improvement is the only way until the burn gets to them. This generally reduces the amount of excuses and makes people strive for improvement, looking up.
Report a bad story. Raise the ante for poor authors.
But these are more in-community benefits. There are pros that spend time reading things on the site. For them, it's very pleasant to see a page of neatly rated fictions. It looks promising, and lucrative. In fact, the domain must offer a reading pleasure for so many people, it's worth investing into it, adding more bandwidth and customised features to make the writing community flourish.
Report a bad story. Get new features and benefits.
And it doesn't end there. Whole families that browse and decide which hobbies would help their children excel in various skills would be happy to see no stories with bad spelling or swearing ('I CUNT SUMMARISE'). It would assure that their kids shouldn't be limited from accessing the website. Instead, they should be given the opportunity to write here because the stories are so swell, and they'd make a wonderful example to lead them on into great deed territory.
Report a bad story. Make Bob's parents happy.
And let's not forget that there are always legal issues FFN users are assigned to defend the site from. Bear in mind that if evil people start plagiarising or doing extremely bad things to English in a particular fandom, huge consequences might follow. The domain already has a specific no-post list. It is growing. Several original authors have shunned FFN, not allowing us to write about their works here. Their fans were not happy, but had to relinquish the works. What if Nintendo decides that the Zelda fandom has to go or the site will be closed? What if the Jonas Brothers feel that FFN is out of control? It all seems implausible until it happens to someone close to you.
Report a bad story. Save whole fandoms from legal destruction.
4. Idle Consequences
The benefits established, you may only wonder what will happen if abuse reports are no longer used for people that don't bother to improve into legal territory. Actually, you don't have to wander. Just check my previous blog post for illustration in a particular fandom.
I'll point out a few of the downsides of leaving things to lay quietly without action.
No respect to Language.
Were it not for the report button, one would be unable to prove an assaulting user that language does matter and it is the cornerstone of respectful story presentation. If you don't report a stubborn user's faulty writing, they are not motivated to improve their language.
No respect to readers
Don't report and you have no realistic leverage against disrespectful people that write abysmal works and then laugh at anyone that reviews or plagiarise said reviews for the sake of amusement.
Abusing Ratings
When evil community members don't wish to disclose a proper rating or include inappropriate content, they try to swallow a greater number of innocent readers and steal attention from fictions the authors of which have actually bothered to prepare a reader-friendly welcome.
Unfair Game
A scripted story takes less time to write than prose. An interactive entry takes less thoughts from the author than a proper novel. Both of these would get more feedback because people wish to solicit ideas and help. In reality, they are falling victim to a stat boosting game, which eventually kills the review as we know it. Review boards turn into forums and the story itself turns into a forum for those involved, while any outsider would consider it a useless clutter. By harvesting reviewer time, these monsters once again steal the spotlight off good fictions written with love, detail and dedication.
Bad Example
And when that happens, authors who have tried hard without any illegal takes either leave or jump in the bandwagon, further deteriorating the website. Seriously, why write a story with depth and characterisation, when you can have Sex in Virgin Valley: Cock Chronicles? With "Submit your positions and I'll write them. Choose your fave characters, too!" in the summary. That kind of writing requires a faceless schematic on an animal level. No planning required. And submissions themselves become a lottery, while popularity of such a monstrosity casts a shade over everyone that doesn't join in the abuse. Once again, why write good if you can write badly and get the same results? Don't erase the bad example: inspire people to deteriorate into the gutter, and call it a very artsy deterioration.
Don't report. Sacrifice FFN on the altar of evil.
Naturally, this applies only when the kind word does not work.
5. Excuses/Questions
This is the last and best part in the entire essay, the excuse depository for every possible argument against reporting illegal fan fiction being wrong.
There are sections: Novice Arguments, Liberal Arguments, Popularity Arguments. The excuses themselves are in no particular order.
Novice Arguments.
#1N. "This is my *insert number* story! I'm improving!"
Improvement has little to do with violating the TOS, Guidelines or Etiquette. Beta readers can be assigned tasks of assuring quality language, and the user claims to have read and understood all the domain's regulations before posting every story.
#2N. "I didn't read the rules!"
Signing any document without reading it leads to great woe in a capitalist society. A fool and his money are soon to be parted, and that is the consequence of ignorance. You take full responsibility for your actions. Post-factum excuses do not save a work; they only exacerbate weakness.
#3N. "I wrote this for my friend *insert name here*!"
FFN is a public domain. Email works well for personal writings. Yours truly uses that and IM clients for personal exchanges. FFN is a public space; therefore, it is irrational to use a dedication as an excuse. Also, it does not reduce the fact of it being illegal or excuse from penalties. Dedicating a crime to Bob does not make the crime any less evil. I'm sure Bob would be scared to have crime committed in his name...
#4N. "It'll get better later!"
Irrelevant. The abuse report regards one chapter and one chapter only. Unless the later refers to improving the chapter in the next few hours, that is no excuse for idleness. Such promises do not change the fact of a story being flagged for deletion. They cut dialogue short often, so stories end up off the site.
#5N. "You're lying!"
This one is impossible to counter because it's like explaining an infant how a thermonuclear reaction makes the sun shine. It's best to just say: "Trust me. Like the admin does."
#6N. "You're not the boss of me!"
The administrator is. When the boss hears of you going loopy and ripping off kind readers with illegal content, the feathers are gonna fly. Once an abuse report has been sent, there's no way to take it back. Just like sending an email or a regular letter. Irrevocable decisions. Crying about superiority does not revoke them. Remember that the admins can see all of your personal messages, so they can track your whines and increase the penalty.
#7N. "I worked really hard on this story!"
So making a few more fix-ups would not be a problem. A caring author cares for a story's healthy lifespan. If complaints and whining are the way you treat your story challenges, maybe writing isn't the right hobby for you? Fear of loss is an extra motivator to improve in this case. Otherwise, the statement is a poor excuse and hypocrisy.
#8N. "You're just ruining my fun. I hate you"
FFN is about fun if you stay within the guidelines. If not, it's torture. There are other websites you can post on. Nobody is forcing you to stay here. However, reminding people that their story is abusive does not even sound like ruining anyone's fun if you consider the admin may remove the account when nothing is done to fix the situation. Wouldn't that really ruin the fun for you? Pointing out the truth is the beginning of a fruitful dialogue. Nothing can survive on lies for long, not even a hypocrite.
#9N. "My story is gone, I'll kill you!"
Harassing a fellow user with threats and losing integrity as a community member is an infraction. Bear in mind that a lost story is not the end of the writing world. Getting yourself banned for further misdemeanour is the end of it on FFN. Consider your priorities before attacking those, who willingly reduce the amount of filth on the domain.
Liberal
#1L. "It's my story; I do what I want!"
Incorrect. FFN takes the worldwide licensing rights of the fiction, which is a legal question for the first fragment. The second fragment is countered with the agreement to uphold and honour the domain's regulations. Anarchy is not an allowable form of conduct.
#2L. "Don't like it, don't read it!"
The issue is not of like or dislike. One cannot project an opinion whether something is written in chat format or not. If the statement is about not liking illegal content, the reply is very simple. One does not need to read a whole scripted chapter to decide that it is illegal. Glancing is enough, which would make the exclamation redundant. Also, informing a user of the abuse report should motivate to improve, not limit communication between the two parties. It leads to no exchange of useful information and the report causing losses.
#3L. "The site should allow me to write *insert illegal entry here*."
You agree in the TOS not to alter the website. You agreed to the set of responsibilities and rights you were given, so any belated whining is voided by your contract with FFN. One cannot deny the documented existence of your agreement with FFN. Remember that the domain is privately-owned. You are not a shareholder, and your opinion is irrelevant. Buy the website and you will be allowed. Until you do, rules apply to all.
#4L. "The rules were different when I joined!"
However, you are to get along with the times or be deemed obsolete. Living in the past leads to tremendous problems in the future, so fixing an illegal story into a legal shape is essential to save it. The excuse does not prevent abuse reports. FFN went towards specialisation, and dumped such thins as lists, chat format, adult content and original fiction, which were adopted by sister sites such as Fiction Press and Adult Fan Fiction. Nobody is leashing you to the site.
#5L. "The site's motto is: 'Unleash your imagination'! You're limiting it!"
Commercial slogans are a set of marketable words. The motto used to be: "Unleash your imagination and free your soul," but that one shortened down. It's nice that FFN's marketing works well on you, but you are not to believe every ad you see. In other words, you are to unleash your imagination*
*Rules and Conditions apply.
#6L. "You're not letting me be creative."
Anyone can work in a mansion surrounded by beautiful scenery and lush lawns on the hillside. However, it takes a real artist to make the plain look special. It's a challenge of creating added value where it is not. True creativity does not take. It shares. It gives. FFN is as free as your lust and arrogance deem it. For some people, rules are very obvious and they exist without a need for extra reference. For some others, they are a constant hindrance because they want fame and attention with minimum effort. Cutting corners too much is bound to slash someone's throat sooner or later, and that, dear colleagues, is illegal even in the real world.
#7L. "Murder is not at all like breaking the rules!"
FFN bleeds quality. People bleed fluids. On a metaphysical level, it's the same. On a philosophical level, vibrations of a greedy hypocrite that willingly breaks the rules are equal to that of a child molester ready to strike another victim. It's all illegal, so they're brothers in arms. Are you a molester's brother?
#8L. "You're saying the slogan lies?"
No, I'm saying the slogan is a slogan, not an axiom and/or a pure holy principle. It is to be taken with a pinch of salt like every "buy one Bob for the price of two" advertising scheme. Besides, if you require crime to be imaginative, there are other sites, and institutions you can visit.
#9L. "You're evil for reporting."
Exercising one's rights is not evil. It is only silly to undermine one's rights because they do not allow one to live up to the full capacity within the frame of proper society. There is a misconception that an anarchist has when facing the long arm of the law. Disagreeing with a reporting party's decision does not void the abuse report.
Popularity
#1P. "Others like this story"
Others don't prevent deletion. In fact, only you can prevent your story from being pulled down by editing the illegal content out as soon as possible. If other reviewers really liked your work, they would have pointed out that the story is illegal. Fans care and are not afraid to tell when the gold turns to rotten apples. Otherwise, they're just yes men that are quite ugly to have around. They don't speak the truth.
#2P. "I have more reviewers than you, so shush"
Stories with eight-thousand reviews disappeared in the past, and stories with over a hundred chapters also poofed into the abyss. Review counts do not give any leverage against any single abuse report.
#3P. "I'll send my fans after you!"
Fans cannot get a story back. Petitions, protests, shouting and bothering the staff can only make matters worse. Remember the TOS? No right to alter the domain. Trying to foist changes through fandom rebounds on everyone. Script writers went too far in the past. And the administrator forbade script. List posters went the same way. What dastardly rule will your uproar cause?
#4P. "You're ruining it for all of my fans!"
See #1P. Real fans mean well for the story and the author. If they are real fans, they are really honest and helpful. Ignoring illegal content is just brewing cancer until it becomes a large problem difficult to treat from the story. If other readers did not point out the infraction, it's your fault for not asking for advice, and their fault for not offering a reality check. Get real!
#5P. "My friends will leave the site if this story is removed!"
No writer that has made a proper career on FFN would leave. That I guarantee. As for the flingy visitors that can fly away, these are not predictable to start with, so the domain won't feel any change. Threatening after an abuse report is sent is useless. The report cannot be stopped.
#6P. "There are more stories like mine, you'll never get rid of them!"
Abuse reports are easy to write. Were it not for the helpful queue that gives you improvement time, all of those stories would have been gone, but the administration is merciful and allows dialogue. Only the stubborn criminals are punished.
#7P. "A lot of people will leave the site!"
Script was banned years ago. The site grew. MA was banned years ago. The site grew. If we draw conclusions from these unrelated points, the threat will make the site grow even more. No idea how it works exactly, but the threat would make no change.
#8P. "There are worse stories than mine. Get rid of them first before you get mine."
Is a classic excuse. Keeping up with the Joneses. It's also a classic example of raising oneself by belittling others. "That girl has a torn dress, so I'm awesome." Look up, not down. There are better stories than yours, so you should improve. Besides, the abuse report was already sent, and those other stories will follow suit at the right time.
Remember, readers: as soon as the abuse report is sent, all arguing may come to a halt. God was called to decide who is right and any speculation is just empty hot air. Take action and improve instead of using idle excuses. After all, that is what abuse reports were for: motivating everyone, even the poorest souls to excel and get up from the muddy ground.
Have a nice, abuse-free day.
Thursday, 11 February 2010
Saturday, 30 January 2010
Cities of Fan Fiction: Slimming Down
It's been a while since I updated this thing. Generally, there was no need with issues being either very temporary or too small to post them here.
Lately I've been browsing the Twilight section of FFN. Truly, no other part of the website matches the abysmal stupidity and pig-headedness of members there. I'm a hopeful person that gives people several helpings of second chances, but you know how some individuals are criminal failures, as proven by the repetitive anonymous commentary this essay got on its first day and some fans' disregard of other fandoms for whatever reason. How I got to this conclusion is a long and complicated story, but its synopsis is simple. Before I begin, though, I'd like to make it with an analogy.
There are three types of sections on FFN. Ghost towns, neighborhoods and cities. Ghost towns are the easiest to describe: they are dead. Updates are scarce, there are little stories et cetera.
Small sections (say 15k stories) are like neighborhoods. There is a fixed number of people that stay, the core landlords. They are the backbone of the community with others either moving in permanently (writing alongside you for long periods of time) or renting accommodation. Those who rent basically stay in the shadow of their idols on FFN and have a short lifespan. They move from section to section without having a clear home plate. Sure, when their idols leave the website for whatever reason, they might buy the experienced author's accommodation and use the free niche to prosper. It happens often when some fans decide to prolong the work of some inactive author. Cutesy.
Neighborhoods have perks and flaws. The perk is that it's possible to spread any message via several idols effectively. Since people tend to know one another after a while, communication is fast and you get quick feedback. Another advantage is that people seem to care for one another in such sections. They make friends and gain respect as part of a fixed group. Sadly, that very glue that bonds the community can be an obstruction. When a certain policy/decision/reform is put against an idol, the whole community might start an uproar in support. Stubbornness and inability to accept certain publicly useful decisions (because the benefit to the idol is smaller than that of the public [people are selfish]) can lead to stagnation when it comes to quality of housing (posted stories). One more issue can be found when a person wants to enter the community. When you're that new guy at a party where everyone else is friends with all except you, it might be tough to enter the circle. You're not with the in crowd, so you stay shunned.
Now we reach the question of big sections or cities. I consider Naruto, Harry Potter and Twilight writers the most prominent examples of city folk. A city has LOTS of people. The people rarely interact and you don't notice many strangers in its streets. It's very easy to disappear, blend into the crowd in a city. Likewise, it's easy to find friends in one because city dwellers are lonely. This lack of integration and being scattered into tiny isolated groups makes people very sensitive to communication. That's a definite perk. It's a lot easier to find like-minded people in a city section than a neighborhood. However, it's very difficult to gain sufficient leverage in a city for anything at all since most people will not notice you. Example: by the time you click and review one story on the front page, it's already on page two. This way, a lot of things remain in the shade, and you never know what exactly you have missed. Maybe a gem waiting to be discovered or a guy with a knife waiting to butcher your eyes. Cities are dangerous places. Crime and filth can call them a safe haven, though. The more people, the easier to find a sucker to rob. If you die, chances are nobody will care. In a neighborhood, everyone would mourn you. This is one of the reasons why inhabitants of cities (people who write mainly in those sections) end up depressed and their creative health deteriorates to animalistic urges. Why try to have a nice friendly home when you can open a whore house and reap benefits from sad individuals? Not a question.
Some of you are probably curious why I've gotten through such an extensive visual tirade. I'm a critic. I review fictions with the goal of attaining a higher level of literary quality in a section. My home plate, Sonic the Hedgehog, was successful in that sense. How come? It's a neighborhood. Yes, it was a bit difficult at first with idols opposing critique, having been used to pure praise and nothing less, but eventually constructive criticism became a standard. Now it's a beautiful sight: people are not afraid to speak their mind! When someone posts an outright abusive story, they don't get censored greeting cards and flowers, but what they deserve. It's a marvelous example of community spirit with central values. Improvement and quality are just a few of them. Branching into other neighborhoods (like Pokemon) also proved itself a worthwhile experience. Changes have occurred there, too. That's the power of change one person carries.
And now we reach Twilight, the big city, and a peeve one person cannot physically contain. I can't even start explaining how horrid the experience of a critic is in those parts. In a neighborhood, there is a certain standard of respect. People try to mirror one's levelheaded reviews and ask intelligent questions. Moreover, account age is also a factor people consider before making judgments. Not the best way of evaluating something, but it works. In a city, there is none of that. Any 12-year-old that is not of legal age to write on FFN will subject any random critic to verbal abuse for as much as touching the issue of spelling and effort. The sensitivity and personal intake of critical messages make communication downright impossible.
The typical conversation goes somewhat like this:
- review
- angry response with 'don't read if you don't like + this is my story + i write what i want'
- my reply of 'i can't like/dislike a story without reading it first + respecting readers is a core value for a writer + guidelines prevent anarchy'
- the recipient's message 'i don't care what u think + i saw worse stories'
- my post with 'you're typing so much text telling me you don't care it sounds like you care + it's best to use better stories as an example, not worse ones'
- the already mad author 'i have a difficult life: my mother is a drunk + i really don't care what you think about me not caring (in 5 sentences)'
- the finisher 'you have written me more text saying you don't care than it is necessary to fix your whole story'
- the critic is blocked
It's impossible to approach them with kindness because the recipient merely starts laughing. And, generally, all conversation ends up in a standstill with excuses. The issue becomes absurd when some nihilist poster decides that script is legal here because nobody told them it wasn't. My reasoning is as simple as lying about one's age to start writing. Guidelines are accepted and read before posting. One should have enough boldness and tactlessness to ignore them to start with. Now, ignoring the call to change the outlawed story before it is too late is out of any logical frame.
Ironically, an abuse report is as potent on a small story as it is on a long scripted epic. The posters of the latter tend to think because their story has a few more reviews than the next fiction (that is legal), they are above the law and can post just about anything for drones that copy/paste reviews from one story to the next. Seriously, when you get a one-liner review, chances are the person never read the story at all.
Abuse reports take time to write for any individual upload. For big cities where crime remained unpunished for a long time, that is also quite a labour-taking task. In Twilight, I have seen stories that stand next to poison in terms of the message they bring. Those fictions get praise, naturally. They are copied and that poison spreads. Eventually, one comes to the realisation that the whole fandom is going downhill via numerous negligent posters that consider writing about shallow topics the best medicine for impopularity. During a single brief visit in the Twilight section, I have found that the authors consider the following legal:
First updates page infractions:
- author's notes for multiple chapters
- author's note chapters to avenge criticism
- scripted author's note chapters
- two-liner author's note chapters
- MA incest
- MA vore (cannibalism for sexual pleasure)
- MA sadism/masochism
- MA child molestation
- MA exhibitionism
- MA violence, including decapitation
- MA paraphilias
- MA titles
- MA summaries
- spam chapters
- scripted chapters
- IM chapters
- centred script chapters
- unchaptered script
- character submission interactivity
- idea submission interactivity
- voting interactivity
- advertising interactivity
- aggressive disregard to proper language
- aggressive disregard to structure and format
- aggressive formating in bold and/or italics
- all-capitals titles
- all-capitals summaries
- spam summaries
- duplicate posts
- plagiarism
Et cetera.
Since I'm unused to such volume of wrongness thrown at me in a single day, I asked myself the logical question: "How could this happen?!" The website has quality control, so where are the moderators looking, too. No matter. One can complain only after taking significant action.
The difficulty with acting in the Twilight environment is that communication is stilted in a city. One removed story makes a drop in the sea of filth. Users have gotten so bold as to advertise openly sexual innuendos and pornographic content right in their summaries on a teenage domain. Not only is this immoral and wrong, but also shows how...uneducated are the actual writers there. And all of them use the same excuse of having seen worse stories. My eyes were ready to explode when a thirteen-year-old posted a story with a woman diving on a 20-inch penis. Children of that age are not old enough to read their own works. For a psychiatrist, Twilight is a goldmine of various pathologies and disorders. I have actually yet to read a story void of swearing and emotional negativity there. The material available there is plainly dangerous.
What upsets me the most is the hedonism found in an increasing amount of new members' writing. I can't call it creative fiction or fiction at all. Stories start off with explanations of boredom and things being average. Then comes the perfectly undescribed painless sex scene with no sense of proportion. Advertising of one's videos, websites and hogwash comes next. The whole page looks like an assortment of scripted speeches with 'he said' slapped at the side. Story after story, it looks equally bland. The mainstream posters (not writers!) don't strive to feed one's soul. They just want to take. Page hits, reviews, attention, popularity. There is no giving. No sharing.
Something of a virus is easily found in uploads at Twilight. Members do not feel the need to write descriptions. No. They merely post links to pictures of objects/characters inside the story (for instance: http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5521833/1/The_Gossip_in_Forks). The first time I've found a post like that, I gawked for a while. Some rummaging later, one could notice it's not a rare phenomenon. When I looked at the guidelines, I didn't even know which infraction was it. The level of utterly miserable literary failure was so unfathomable, so impenetrably deep that one's logics need to create a wholly new toolkit to manage a response.
And they get praise.
And they believe the praise is well-deserved.
I shuddered. Despite the grim outlook, things are salvageable. What one person cannot swallow, a group can easily share. The fact a city establishment makes it easy to bring a reform up to particular members plays into the hands of authors that actually try to write. Honestly, why do people break the guidelines? To get better stats. What are the results? Quality stories are drained of attention and disappear in the sea of dirt. That said, it is field day for a reviewer to do just about anything to make the gems more noticeable and drain the mud. Medicine tends to be bitter, and nobody asks the virus about its reflections on the matter.
That's why it's my pleasure to present you the Literate Union, an organisation willing to help deliver the vaccine. See, ladies and gentlemen, there are people that want to make change. They can make change. And they will. How do I know this? If one person can protect several thousand people from neighborhood poison, one group can protect a city full of inhabitants.
It's a positive note for the otherwise moody essay. Things may be bad there. Heck, a hundred stories worth erasing probably popped up in Twilight during production of the previous few paragraphs. But it's a trend. And trends are not made of concrete.
Anyone curious about the Literate Union can find its members here:
http://forum.fanfiction.net/forum/Literate_Union/61196/
Have a nice, abuse-free day.
P.S. I'm not in the Literate Union. Misguided comments are misguided.
P.P.S. The conclusion is: tons of stories were removed since February. The angry illegal content addicts had to move, receiving no leverage or support from the owners. Don't underestimate your critics.
Lately I've been browsing the Twilight section of FFN. Truly, no other part of the website matches the abysmal stupidity and pig-headedness of members there. I'm a hopeful person that gives people several helpings of second chances, but you know how some individuals are criminal failures, as proven by the repetitive anonymous commentary this essay got on its first day and some fans' disregard of other fandoms for whatever reason. How I got to this conclusion is a long and complicated story, but its synopsis is simple. Before I begin, though, I'd like to make it with an analogy.
There are three types of sections on FFN. Ghost towns, neighborhoods and cities. Ghost towns are the easiest to describe: they are dead. Updates are scarce, there are little stories et cetera.
Small sections (say 15k stories) are like neighborhoods. There is a fixed number of people that stay, the core landlords. They are the backbone of the community with others either moving in permanently (writing alongside you for long periods of time) or renting accommodation. Those who rent basically stay in the shadow of their idols on FFN and have a short lifespan. They move from section to section without having a clear home plate. Sure, when their idols leave the website for whatever reason, they might buy the experienced author's accommodation and use the free niche to prosper. It happens often when some fans decide to prolong the work of some inactive author. Cutesy.
Neighborhoods have perks and flaws. The perk is that it's possible to spread any message via several idols effectively. Since people tend to know one another after a while, communication is fast and you get quick feedback. Another advantage is that people seem to care for one another in such sections. They make friends and gain respect as part of a fixed group. Sadly, that very glue that bonds the community can be an obstruction. When a certain policy/decision/reform is put against an idol, the whole community might start an uproar in support. Stubbornness and inability to accept certain publicly useful decisions (because the benefit to the idol is smaller than that of the public [people are selfish]) can lead to stagnation when it comes to quality of housing (posted stories). One more issue can be found when a person wants to enter the community. When you're that new guy at a party where everyone else is friends with all except you, it might be tough to enter the circle. You're not with the in crowd, so you stay shunned.
Now we reach the question of big sections or cities. I consider Naruto, Harry Potter and Twilight writers the most prominent examples of city folk. A city has LOTS of people. The people rarely interact and you don't notice many strangers in its streets. It's very easy to disappear, blend into the crowd in a city. Likewise, it's easy to find friends in one because city dwellers are lonely. This lack of integration and being scattered into tiny isolated groups makes people very sensitive to communication. That's a definite perk. It's a lot easier to find like-minded people in a city section than a neighborhood. However, it's very difficult to gain sufficient leverage in a city for anything at all since most people will not notice you. Example: by the time you click and review one story on the front page, it's already on page two. This way, a lot of things remain in the shade, and you never know what exactly you have missed. Maybe a gem waiting to be discovered or a guy with a knife waiting to butcher your eyes. Cities are dangerous places. Crime and filth can call them a safe haven, though. The more people, the easier to find a sucker to rob. If you die, chances are nobody will care. In a neighborhood, everyone would mourn you. This is one of the reasons why inhabitants of cities (people who write mainly in those sections) end up depressed and their creative health deteriorates to animalistic urges. Why try to have a nice friendly home when you can open a whore house and reap benefits from sad individuals? Not a question.
Some of you are probably curious why I've gotten through such an extensive visual tirade. I'm a critic. I review fictions with the goal of attaining a higher level of literary quality in a section. My home plate, Sonic the Hedgehog, was successful in that sense. How come? It's a neighborhood. Yes, it was a bit difficult at first with idols opposing critique, having been used to pure praise and nothing less, but eventually constructive criticism became a standard. Now it's a beautiful sight: people are not afraid to speak their mind! When someone posts an outright abusive story, they don't get censored greeting cards and flowers, but what they deserve. It's a marvelous example of community spirit with central values. Improvement and quality are just a few of them. Branching into other neighborhoods (like Pokemon) also proved itself a worthwhile experience. Changes have occurred there, too. That's the power of change one person carries.
And now we reach Twilight, the big city, and a peeve one person cannot physically contain. I can't even start explaining how horrid the experience of a critic is in those parts. In a neighborhood, there is a certain standard of respect. People try to mirror one's levelheaded reviews and ask intelligent questions. Moreover, account age is also a factor people consider before making judgments. Not the best way of evaluating something, but it works. In a city, there is none of that. Any 12-year-old that is not of legal age to write on FFN will subject any random critic to verbal abuse for as much as touching the issue of spelling and effort. The sensitivity and personal intake of critical messages make communication downright impossible.
The typical conversation goes somewhat like this:
- review
- angry response with 'don't read if you don't like + this is my story + i write what i want'
- my reply of 'i can't like/dislike a story without reading it first + respecting readers is a core value for a writer + guidelines prevent anarchy'
- the recipient's message 'i don't care what u think + i saw worse stories'
- my post with 'you're typing so much text telling me you don't care it sounds like you care + it's best to use better stories as an example, not worse ones'
- the already mad author 'i have a difficult life: my mother is a drunk + i really don't care what you think about me not caring (in 5 sentences)'
- the finisher 'you have written me more text saying you don't care than it is necessary to fix your whole story'
- the critic is blocked
It's impossible to approach them with kindness because the recipient merely starts laughing. And, generally, all conversation ends up in a standstill with excuses. The issue becomes absurd when some nihilist poster decides that script is legal here because nobody told them it wasn't. My reasoning is as simple as lying about one's age to start writing. Guidelines are accepted and read before posting. One should have enough boldness and tactlessness to ignore them to start with. Now, ignoring the call to change the outlawed story before it is too late is out of any logical frame.
Ironically, an abuse report is as potent on a small story as it is on a long scripted epic. The posters of the latter tend to think because their story has a few more reviews than the next fiction (that is legal), they are above the law and can post just about anything for drones that copy/paste reviews from one story to the next. Seriously, when you get a one-liner review, chances are the person never read the story at all.
Abuse reports take time to write for any individual upload. For big cities where crime remained unpunished for a long time, that is also quite a labour-taking task. In Twilight, I have seen stories that stand next to poison in terms of the message they bring. Those fictions get praise, naturally. They are copied and that poison spreads. Eventually, one comes to the realisation that the whole fandom is going downhill via numerous negligent posters that consider writing about shallow topics the best medicine for impopularity. During a single brief visit in the Twilight section, I have found that the authors consider the following legal:
First updates page infractions:
- author's notes for multiple chapters
- author's note chapters to avenge criticism
- scripted author's note chapters
- two-liner author's note chapters
- MA incest
- MA vore (cannibalism for sexual pleasure)
- MA sadism/masochism
- MA child molestation
- MA exhibitionism
- MA violence, including decapitation
- MA paraphilias
- MA titles
- MA summaries
- spam chapters
- scripted chapters
- IM chapters
- centred script chapters
- unchaptered script
- character submission interactivity
- idea submission interactivity
- voting interactivity
- advertising interactivity
- aggressive disregard to proper language
- aggressive disregard to structure and format
- aggressive formating in bold and/or italics
- all-capitals titles
- all-capitals summaries
- spam summaries
- duplicate posts
- plagiarism
Et cetera.
Since I'm unused to such volume of wrongness thrown at me in a single day, I asked myself the logical question: "How could this happen?!" The website has quality control, so where are the moderators looking, too. No matter. One can complain only after taking significant action.
The difficulty with acting in the Twilight environment is that communication is stilted in a city. One removed story makes a drop in the sea of filth. Users have gotten so bold as to advertise openly sexual innuendos and pornographic content right in their summaries on a teenage domain. Not only is this immoral and wrong, but also shows how...uneducated are the actual writers there. And all of them use the same excuse of having seen worse stories. My eyes were ready to explode when a thirteen-year-old posted a story with a woman diving on a 20-inch penis. Children of that age are not old enough to read their own works. For a psychiatrist, Twilight is a goldmine of various pathologies and disorders. I have actually yet to read a story void of swearing and emotional negativity there. The material available there is plainly dangerous.
What upsets me the most is the hedonism found in an increasing amount of new members' writing. I can't call it creative fiction or fiction at all. Stories start off with explanations of boredom and things being average. Then comes the perfectly undescribed painless sex scene with no sense of proportion. Advertising of one's videos, websites and hogwash comes next. The whole page looks like an assortment of scripted speeches with 'he said' slapped at the side. Story after story, it looks equally bland. The mainstream posters (not writers!) don't strive to feed one's soul. They just want to take. Page hits, reviews, attention, popularity. There is no giving. No sharing.
Something of a virus is easily found in uploads at Twilight. Members do not feel the need to write descriptions. No. They merely post links to pictures of objects/characters inside the story (for instance: http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5521833/1/The_Gossip_in_Forks). The first time I've found a post like that, I gawked for a while. Some rummaging later, one could notice it's not a rare phenomenon. When I looked at the guidelines, I didn't even know which infraction was it. The level of utterly miserable literary failure was so unfathomable, so impenetrably deep that one's logics need to create a wholly new toolkit to manage a response.
And they get praise.
And they believe the praise is well-deserved.
I shuddered. Despite the grim outlook, things are salvageable. What one person cannot swallow, a group can easily share. The fact a city establishment makes it easy to bring a reform up to particular members plays into the hands of authors that actually try to write. Honestly, why do people break the guidelines? To get better stats. What are the results? Quality stories are drained of attention and disappear in the sea of dirt. That said, it is field day for a reviewer to do just about anything to make the gems more noticeable and drain the mud. Medicine tends to be bitter, and nobody asks the virus about its reflections on the matter.
That's why it's my pleasure to present you the Literate Union, an organisation willing to help deliver the vaccine. See, ladies and gentlemen, there are people that want to make change. They can make change. And they will. How do I know this? If one person can protect several thousand people from neighborhood poison, one group can protect a city full of inhabitants.
It's a positive note for the otherwise moody essay. Things may be bad there. Heck, a hundred stories worth erasing probably popped up in Twilight during production of the previous few paragraphs. But it's a trend. And trends are not made of concrete.
Anyone curious about the Literate Union can find its members here:
http://forum.fanfiction.net/forum/Literate_Union/61196/
Have a nice, abuse-free day.
P.S. I'm not in the Literate Union. Misguided comments are misguided.
P.P.S. The conclusion is: tons of stories were removed since February. The angry illegal content addicts had to move, receiving no leverage or support from the owners. Don't underestimate your critics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)